Tropical Cyclone Ethel
● Data reliability: ReliableWeather satellites monitored it throughout, so its track and intensity are relatively accurate (Atlantic and E. Pacific since 1966, other basins since 1980).
Ethel at 2012-01-17 14:00:00 (BeijingTime) 在South Indian Ocean首次被记录, peak intensity 为Tropical Cyclone , max wind 约 36 m/s (1 分钟平均) , minimum central pressure 972 hPa, at 2012-01-24 08:00:00前后结束, total 记录 28 track points (6 h一个) .
| Time (BeijingTime) | Position | Category (local) | wind speed m/s | Pressure hPa |
|---|
| 2012-01-17 14:00 | -10.3°S, 74.0°E | Tropical Disturbance | 8.2 | 1005 |
| 2012-01-18 02:00 | -11.7°S, 73.3°E | Tropical Disturbance | 8.2 | 1005 |
| 2012-01-18 14:00 | -12.8°S, 70.9°E | Tropical Disturbance | 10.3 | 1003 |
| 2012-01-19 02:00 | -13.8°S, 68.6°E | Tropical Disturbance | 15.4 | 998 |
| 2012-01-19 14:00 | -15.0°S, 67.0°E | Moderate Tropical Storm | 23.1 | 992 |
| 2012-01-20 02:00 | -17.3°S, 65.9°E | Severe Tropical Storm | 28.3 | 983 |
| 2012-01-20 14:00 | -18.4°S, 64.9°E | Severe Tropical Storm | 33.4 | 975 |
| 2012-01-21 02:00 | -19.9°S, 64.2°E | Tropical Cyclone | 36 | 972 |
| 2012-01-21 14:00 | -21.6°S, 63.8°E | Severe Tropical Storm | 33.4 | 975 |
| 2012-01-22 02:00 | -23.5°S, 64.0°E | Severe Tropical Storm | 28.3 | 985 |
| 2012-01-22 14:00 | -26.2°S, 64.6°E | Moderate Tropical Storm | 23.1 | 985 |
| 2012-01-23 02:00 | -29.3°S, 65.9°E | Extratropical cyclone | 20.6 | 988 |
| 2012-01-23 14:00 | -31.8°S, 68.4°E | Extratropical cyclone | 20.6 | 993 |
| 2012-01-24 02:00 | -34.5°S, 75.6°E | Extratropical cyclone | 27.8 | - |
| 2012-01-24 08:00 | -37.0°S, 81.8°E | Extratropical cyclone | 27.8 | - |
Data sources: NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information IBTrACS v04r01 (Knapp et al., 2010), code 2012017S10074 / SH072012. There is no official Chinese name for this system, so the original English name is used. Intensity is classified by the local agency in the relevant sea area, converted from 1-minute sustained winds using the WMO factor, for reference only. Data notes · Incorrect translation?