Tropical Cyclone Daryl
● Data reliability: ReliableWeather satellites monitored it throughout, so its track and intensity are relatively accurate (Atlantic and E. Pacific since 1966, other basins since 1980).
Daryl at 2006-01-17 08:00:00 (BeijingTime) 在South Indian Ocean首次被记录, peak intensity 为Category 1 Tropical Cyclone , max wind 约 25.7 m/s (1 分钟平均) , minimum central pressure 976 hPa, at 2006-01-23 20:00:00前后结束, total 记录 27 track points (6 h一个) . 曾Landfall或贴近land.
| Time (BeijingTime) | Position | Category (local) | wind speed m/s | Pressure hPa |
|---|
| 2006-01-17 08:00 | -15.3°S, 125.6°E | Tropical Depression | 11.3 | 998 |
| 2006-01-17 20:00 | -15.4°S, 124.9°E | Tropical Depression | 11.3 | 996 |
| 2006-01-18 08:00 | -15.6°S, 124.2°E | Tropical Depression | 13.9 | 994 |
| 2006-01-18 20:00 | -15.9°S, 123.2°E | Tropical Depression | 12.9 | 990 |
| 2006-01-19 08:00 | -16.2°S, 122.6°E | Tropical Depression | 18 | 980 |
| 2006-01-19 20:00 | -16.9°S, 121.5°E | Category 1 Tropical Cyclone | 20.6 | 976 |
| 2006-01-20 08:00 | -17.5°S, 120.7°E | Category 1 Tropical Cyclone | 25.7 | 976 |
| 2006-01-20 20:00 | -18.6°S, 119.3°E | Category 1 Tropical Cyclone | 25.7 | 976 |
| 2006-01-21 08:00 | -19.3°S, 116.9°E | Category 1 Tropical Cyclone | 25.7 | 976 |
| 2006-01-21 20:00 | -19.9°S, 115.8°E | Category 1 Tropical Cyclone | 20.6 | 976 |
| 2006-01-22 08:00 | -20.3°S, 114.8°E | Category 1 Tropical Cyclone | 20.6 | 986 |
| 2006-01-22 20:00 | -20.7°S, 113.5°E | Tropical Depression | 15.4 | 992 |
| 2006-01-23 08:00 | -22.2°S, 111.3°E | Tropical Depression | 12.9 | 996 |
| 2006-01-23 20:00 | -24.0°S, 108.9°E | Tropical Depression | 10.3 | 1004 |
Data sources: NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information IBTrACS v04r01 (Knapp et al., 2010), code 2006017S15126 / SH082006. This basin has no official Chinese name, so the original English name is used. Intensity categories follow the local agency classification for the basin, converted from 1-minute sustained winds using the WMO factor, and are for reference only. Data notes · Incorrect translation?