1999巴基斯坦气旋 (1999 Pakistan cyclone)
● Data reliability: ReliableWeather satellites monitored it throughout, so its track and intensity are relatively accurate (Atlantic and E. Pacific since 1966, other basins since 1980).
巴基斯坦气旋 (1999 Pakistan cyclone) at 1999-05-15 08:00:00 (BeijingTime) 在North Indian Ocean首次被记录, peak intensity 为极强The Cyclone Storm, max wind 约 56.6 m/s (1 分钟平均) , minimum central pressure 946 hPa, at 1999-05-22 20:00:00前后结束, total 记录 31 track points (6 h一个) . 曾Landfall或贴近land.
| Time (BeijingTime) | Position | Category (local) | wind speed m/s | Pressure hPa |
|---|
| 1999-05-15 08:00 | 12.0°N, 72.5°E | Depressions | 12.9 | - |
| 1999-05-15 20:00 | 12.2°N, 72.5°E | Depressions | 12.9 | - |
| 1999-05-16 08:00 | 12.4°N, 72.4°E | Deep Depression | 15.4 | - |
| 1999-05-16 20:00 | 13.0°N, 71.8°E | Deep Depression | 18 | 1000 |
| 1999-05-17 08:00 | 14.0°N, 70.7°E | The Cyclone Storm | 23.1 | 998 |
| 1999-05-17 20:00 | 15.4°N, 69.3°E | 特强The Cyclone Storm | 36 | 984 |
| 1999-05-18 08:00 | 16.8°N, 68.3°E | 特强The Cyclone Storm | 46.3 | 976 |
| 1999-05-18 20:00 | 18.7°N, 67.4°E | 极强The Cyclone Storm | 51.4 | 950 |
| 1999-05-19 08:00 | 20.4°N, 67.3°E | 极强The Cyclone Storm | 56.6 | 948 |
| 1999-05-19 20:00 | 21.7°N, 67.4°E | 极强The Cyclone Storm | 56.6 | 946 |
| 1999-05-20 08:00 | 23.2°N, 67.7°E | 极强The Cyclone Storm | 56.6 | 946 |
| 1999-05-20 20:00 | 24.3°N, 68.2°E | 极强The Cyclone Storm | 51.4 | - |
| 1999-05-21 08:00 | 24.9°N, 69.1°E | 特强The Cyclone Storm | 46.3 | - |
| 1999-05-21 20:00 | 25.5°N, 70.1°E | 强The Cyclone Storm | 28.3 | - |
| 1999-05-22 08:00 | 26.5°N, 71.0°E | Tropical Cyclone | - | - |
| 1999-05-22 20:00 | 27.5°N, 72.0°E | Tropical Cyclone | - | - |
Data sources: NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information IBTrACS v04r01 (Knapp et al., 2010), code 1999135N12073 / IO021999. Chinese name source: Wikidata Q4595012. Intensity ratings follow the classifications of the local agency in each basin, converted from 1-minute sustained winds using the WMO factor, for reference only. Data notes · Incorrect translation?